0% complete 01 — Project details Enter the project name and select your name before scoring. Project name e.g. Ravenspoint Roof Replacement Trustee name 02 — Trustee perspective Conflict check Score 0–5. A high score indicates a conflict of interest and will be deducted from your total. Declare any significant conflict to the board before proceeding. Question Max Score Do you live in close proximity to this project or applicant? 3 0 Are you involved in this project? 5 0 Do you have any family or close connections to this project? 4 0 Does this project strongly connect to your personal interests and beliefs? 3 0 Conflict score (deducted) 0 03 — Charitable purposes of the Trust Score 0–6 for each purpose. For the MTA criterion: Pairc, Kinloch and North Harris areas each score 2. Charitable purpose Wt Score Benefit of residents within Muaitheabhal Trust Area (Pairc / Kinloch / North Harris = 2 each) 5 0 Benefit of residents of the Western Isles 1 0 Benefit of residents in need due to age, ill health, disability or financial hardship 1 0 Promote and provide recreational and leisure facilities, improving conditions of life 1 0 Conservation, preservation and restoration of the environment and heritage of the Western Isles, including sustainable crofting 1 0 Advancing education and educational opportunities 1 0 Section total 0 04 — Project location Routing Your answer determines which priorities section you complete. Only one priorities section will count toward your total. Is this project within the Muaitheabhal Trust Area? 06 — Beneficiaries, evidence, funding & other Score each sub-section as applicable. For beneficiary numbers and funding proportion, score only the row that applies to this project. Number of people this project will benefit Range Wt Score Under 10 people 1 0 11 to 20 people 2 0 21 to 50 people 3 0 51 to 99 people 4 0 100 or more people 5 0 Beneficiaries total 0 Demonstrated evidence of need and support Evidence type Wt Score Questionnaire 5 0 Surveys 5 0 Letters of support 4 0 Partnership 3 0 Fit with local plan 5 0 Evidence total 0 Amount of funding requested from MCWFT Proportion of total project cost Wt Score 1 to 40% of total project costs 5 0 41 to 50% of total project costs 4 0 51 to 95% of total project costs 3 0 Using own funds or local fundraising effort 4 0 Funding proportion total 0 Other information (if applicable) Factor Wt Score Business plan and financial projections supplied (projects over £50,000) 5 0 Employment of people within the MTA 5 0 Employment of people outwith the MTA 4 0 Volunteer effort 5 0 Other information total 0 07 — Value for money Bearing in mind the amount requested, what is your overall view of the value this project represents? Select one option only. Assessment Points Select Nil or negligible 0 — Limited or satisfactory 2 — Moderate, satisfactory but not outstanding 4 — High or outstanding 5 — Value for money score 0 08 — Decision and comments Enter your recommendation, any conditions you would attach, and any additional comments for the board. Recommendation and comments Enter your recommendation, any conditions, or concerns about this application... Score summary Project and trustee not yet entered Trustee perspective — conflict deduction -0 Charitable purposes of Trust 0 Trust priorities 0 Number of beneficiaries 0 Demonstrated evidence of need 0 Amount of funding requested 0 Other information 0 Value for money 0 Total score 0 Generate board summary Print Reset form Muaitheabhal Community Wind Farm Trust — Trustee Scoring Form 2026 — Complete in any web browser